IcedTea7 Zero/Shark build patch, take 2
gbenson at redhat.com
Tue Nov 17 05:29:49 PST 2009
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/11/17 Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat.com>:
> > Given that my previous patch turned out to be not such a good
> > idea, how about this one? It removes the core build stuff, which
> > isn't required for upstream Zero and was causing some files
> > (jvm.cfg and ergo_$arch.c) to be created that are now handled
> > upstream. It also removes a patch that seems to have been left
> > behind from somewhere. Ok to commit?
> It wasn't that the last patch wasn't a good idea, I'm just wary
> about disrupting the build too much just before the release. I
> hoped to have 1.12 out by now but keep finding more and more issues
> This patch looks fine, just dropping dead options, so please commit.
More information about the zero-dev