[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8066621: Suppress deprecation warnings in java.desktop module

Victor D'yakov victor.dyakov at oracle.com
Thu Dec 11 06:20:05 UTC 2014

Do we need to split it to AWT, Swing and 2D?
The email is to 3 lists and its not clear who would pick up reviewing it.

Also please use "client" forest this is our repo for pre-integration 
testing all together with Client SQE we are following to avoid 
regression cases.


On 10.12.2014 3:41, joe darcy wrote:
> Hello,
> In support of JEP 212: Resolve Lint and Doclint Warnings 
> (http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/212), which is targeted to JDK 9, please 
> review the large but straightforward set of changes in the webrev:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8066621.0/
> Some background of the approach being taken to address this part of 
> JEP 212 was discussed on core-libs:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-December/030085.html 
> Briefly, to allow the deprecation warnings to be dealt with and that 
> sole remaining lint warning category enabled in the build, a two-step 
> approach is being taken. The first step is to suppress the deprecation 
> warnings and the second step is for area-experts to examine the 
> specific uses of deprecated APIs in their code. This webrev only 
> attempts to cover the first step.
> The webrev is based off of the JDK 9 "dev" forest rather than the 
> "client" forest. Since the change only involves copyright updates and 
> adding annotations, there would be no functional modification in the 
> changeset. Therefore, I would strongly prefer to push these changes 
> directly to dev rather than pushing them to client and waiting for 
> them to propagate to dev to expedite the time when the build warning 
> can be enabled. (If a warning is not enabled in the build, new 
> instances of the warning tend to creep into the code base.)
> Thanks,
> -Joe

More information about the 2d-dev mailing list