[OpenJDK 2D-Dev]  JDK-8176287 :[macosx] The print test crashed with Nimbus L&F
prasanta.sadhukhan at oracle.com
Tue Mar 14 05:14:15 UTC 2017
On 3/14/2017 10:24 AM, Philip Race wrote:
> The problem seems to have been that you were allocating zero bytes in
> the old code :
> 950 CGFloat* colors= (CGFloat*)calloc(0, sizeof(CGFloat)*length);
> 960 qsdo->gradientInfo->colordata = (CGFloat*)calloc(0,
> sizeof(CGFloat)*4*length); Regarding the new code, whilst it seems
> like it fixes the problem I have a nit
> 937 int i;
> 938 for (i=0; i<length; i++)
> Since this code appears at the start of a block I'd expect all
> compilers to be happy with
> for (int i=0; i<length; i++)
> is this not so ? Assuming yes, pls fix before push.
Yes, it should be ok. I got a problem with jdk8u JPRT build (during
earlier backport) citing C99 compiler failure but I guess that was
because variable was declared not at blockstart.
Will again do a JPRT and if its ok, I will push with this change.
> Also I wonder if the regression test we created for LGP passes only
> because it is "short".
> Perhaps later we can improve on that.
> The fix will also need to be backported since the original fix was
> So "+1" with those comments ..
> On 3/12/17, 11:49 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Please review a jck print test crash fix for jdk9. The issue was seen
>> with only Nimbus L&F which seems to use Linear gradient path
>> and not in other L&F (such as Aqua) .
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176287
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8176287/webrev.00/
>> Linear Gradient path collects the gradient colors and fractions
>> values in native obtained from Java and allocates several arrays to
>> store the same in setupGradient() method.
>> It seems even after being freed, in subsequent call to the same
>> gradient path routine, it may get the same allocated pointer the next
>> time the array is allocated causing it to crash citing "memory being
>> modified after freed".
>> Optimise setupGradient() method to allocate fewer pointer. The JCK
>> test works now.
>> Also, the JDK-8162796 testcase LinearGradientPrintingTest and
>> RadialGradientPrintingTest works with this optimisation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the 2d-dev