[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFC: Fix for JDK-8188030
philip.race at oracle.com
Tue Jun 12 16:46:23 UTC 2018
OK . go ahead .. I just keep failing to get to this.
I think we will have to use a follow-up bug in the eventuality
of remaining issues on Oracle JDK8u.
On 6/11/18, 8:23 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> I realise this is quite an old thread, but do you think I can request
> the proposed patch  for backport to 8?
> We've been shipping it in our RPMs for some time but I think it would
> be much nicer to have this upstreamed for all to consume.
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Phil Race<philip.race at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Sorry .. but there may be more work needed on 8 that I forgot about.
>> But its for Oracle JDK to account for the fact that CFF fonts are still
>> being excluded there.
>> In a nutshell .. if we end up with zero fonts as a result .. just add the
>> Oracle JDK's Lucida Sans
>> as slot 0 font so that there is SOMETHING.
>> However I know you can't test this .. since you don't have that font.
>> So if you'd prefer to stick to what you can test I'd quite understand and
>> we'd handle that part separately.
>> On 11/15/2017 09:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Phil Race<philip.race at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Can you please request 8 backport approval for this version (which I have
>>>> approved as below)
>>>> I know some internal folks who like to see it in 8 as well and I had to
>>>> them you already have a fix for 8 in hand ..
>>>> The jdk-updates project is only for 9+ so the usual old 8 rules should
>>>> for this.
>>> Right, I was sidetracked by that discussion but this is on my list,
>>> I'm preparing the backport request as we speak.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the 2d-dev