[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [14] Review request for 8227392: Colors with alpha are painted incorrectly on Linux, after JDK-8214579

Anton Litvinov anton.litvinov at oracle.com
Thu Jul 11 16:20:42 UTC 2019

By your request regenerated the webrev specifically against 
(http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk13) repository.
JDK 13 specific webrev: 

I confirm again, that 2 failing manual tests: "ColorTest0003", 
"ColorTest0004" from the test "api/java_awt/interactive/ColorTests.html" 
in JCK 13 do not fail anymore after this fix is applied to JDK 13 
compiled from "jdk/jdk13" repository.

"jdk/jdk13" repository does not contain any problem list mentioning 
"api/java_awt/interactive/ColorTests.html" test from JCK 13, thus I 
cannot de-problem list it and have no idea, where it is problem-listed. 
I also doubt that it is problem-listed, since it is manual. I added 
"noreg-jck" label to the bug in JBS deliberately according to OpenJDK 
process (Section #6 from the web page 
(http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html)), because this back 
out fix does not contain a new separate regression test, while this 
regression can be checked by running existing mentioned above test from 
JCK package.

If this "noreg-jck" label creates problems, I can remove it at all.

Thank you,

On 11/07/2019 15:51, Philip Race wrote:
> One more thing I just realised you should do here is de-problem list
> the regression test that fails ... after verifying it now works,
> updating it with this bug ID.
> And you can remove that noreg-jck label as a consequence.
> -phil.
> On 7/11/19, 7:35 AM, Philip Race wrote:
>> In such cases I like more than to be told "it would apply cleanly" 
>> but also to see
>> that you actually prepared the webrev against 13. This is more certain
>> and ensures that when the fix is approved you don't accidentally push it
>> to the wrong repo. You have to go clone 13 and apply the patch there 
>> anyway ...
>> -phil.
>> On 7/11/19, 5:44 AM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>> Hello Phil,
>>> Thank you for review and the important remark about the need to work 
>>> with "jdk/jdk13" stabilization repository, I forgot about this 
>>> feature of post RDP 1 phase. Today I checked the fix against 
>>> "jdk/jdk13" repository and confirm that it resolves this bug for JDK 
>>> 13.
>>> Will wait for feedback or approval from any other second code reviewer.
>>> Thank you,
>>> Anton
>>> On 10/07/2019 19:55, Phil Race wrote:
>>>> Anton,
>>>> This looks fine except that it needs to be prepared against 13, and 
>>>> then pushed there, not 14.
>>>> And it will get forwarded synced from 13 to 14. That is the RDP 
>>>> process ..
>>>> -phil.
>>>> On 7/10/19 5:00 AM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Could you please review the following fix for the bug. The fix is 
>>>>> backing out of the fix for the bug JDK-8214579 which caused this 
>>>>> JCK test failure. If this fix is accepted, then a new separate bug 
>>>>> for readdressing the bug reported in JDK-8214579 will be filed.
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227392
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alitvinov/8227392/jdk14/webrev.00
>>>>> Changeset of JDK-8214579: 
>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/client/rev/c53905e7dc57
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Anton

More information about the 2d-dev mailing list