[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 'Address reliance on default constructors in the Java 2D APIs'
Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com
Sat Aug 29 00:29:45 UTC 2020
Please use such spec for the protected constructor: "Constructor for subclasses to call":
Actually the current text is also fine to me, but looks like many people use the text above as a description.
On 28.08.2020 01:28, Conor Cleary wrote:
> Hello all,
> Could someone please review my changes for JDK-8250855, 'Address reliance on default constructors in the Java 2D APIs'? This issue relates to JDK-8250639 '☂ Address reliance on default constructors in the java.desktop module'. The changes address the reliance on default constructors by adding in basic constructors in the following classes:
> * java.awt.Image
> * java.awt.PrintJob
> * java.awt.font.GlyphVector
> * java.awt.font.LayoutPath
> * java.awt.font.LineMetrics
> * java.awt.image.AbstractMultiResolutionImage
> * java.awt.image.BufferStrategy
> * java.awt.image.ImageFilter
> * java.awt.image.RGBImageFilter
> * java.awt.image.VolatileImage
> * javax.print.PrintServiceLookup
> * javax.print.ServiceUI
> * javax.print.ServiceUIFactory
> * javax.print.StreamPrintServiceFactory
> * javax.print.event.PrintJobAdapter
> A key issue is the accompanying description for each of the added constructors and is probably the feedback I would value most as it has been a point of discussion previously. I have included a specdiff to easily view the changes observed in the api documentation. Currently drafting a CSR for these changes.
> * webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ccleary/issues/webrevs-store/8250855/webrevs/webrev.01/
> * specdiff: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ccleary/issues/webrevs-store/8250855/webrevs/webrev.01/specdiff/overview-summary.html
> * bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250855
> Best Regards,
Best regards, Sergey.
More information about the 2d-dev