martijnverburg at gmail.com
Fri Feb 6 17:18:28 UTC 2015
So I started digging into this (just the HTML path to start with) and the
diff got pretty ridiculous. So I'm going to split the work into several
1.) Fix HTML warnings and convert HTML styling to CSS styling (using
2.) Cosmetic changes to improve readability (change background to white for
contrast, pick a more web readable font etc) and cleaning up any
comments/whitespace in the document.
3.) Structural changes (moving sections around if that seems sensible, I'll
post suggestions first)
4.) Finicky detail changes (the bit that will require the detailed review)
I may combine 1&2 if the diff isn't ridiculously different.
If there's further consensus on Markdown then I can give that a go later
(HTML to Markdown converter to start with anyone? ;-)), but I suspect
Markdown readers aren't as ubiquitous as HTML readers and we'd have also
have to include an "export to output type X" step/tool, not sure how much
work that is, where it would get done etc.
On 5 February 2015 at 22:43, Omair Majid <omajid at redhat.com> wrote:
> * Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com> [2015-02-03 08:48]:
> > In a somewhat related area: I've been toying with the idea of rewriting
> > build-readme in markdown instead, and just generate the html file.
> > proper, consistent html formatting for a document like this is quite
> > painful, and we never seem to get it right. Does it sound like a good
> I really like this idea! With just the right amount of formatting,
> markdown is both easy to read by humans as plain text and turns into
> pretty good looking html too.
> PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
> Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681
More information about the adoption-discuss