JCov and coverage numbers on OpenJDK
benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 13:25:02 UTC 2015
Depending on timings, I can probably be free on Tuesday (I'm on GMT too).
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Martijn Verburg
<martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> As some of you know we've been running some experiments in the Cloudbees
> incubator to see if we can get accurate code coverage numbers using JCov on
> the jdk9 forest in particular.
> John Oliver has gone back and reviewed the process and the numbers and we
> *think* we've gone about it the right way.
> Before we even think about taking the next step to start producing these
> numbers regularly in the incubator, we need to make sure that we've used
> JCov correctly and that the numbers are not misleading.
> It would be great to have a technical call with John Oliver, Mani, someone
> from Rory's team (the person who does the internal OpenJDK numbers?) and
> probably Jonathan Gibbons.
> Does next Tuesday suit folks? It all depends on timezones (John Oliver,
> Mani and myself are GMT)
More information about the adoption-discuss