JDK 9 ea 99 java.version
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Sun Jan 3 09:12:50 UTC 2016
On 03/01/2016 09:01, John Patrick wrote:
> cheers for the history Alan.
> I wasn't sure if 9-ea was going to be used purely during early access
> or if a new structure was going to be used.
> is their a source file, java doc or mail list message detailing the
> changes or new Java 9 setup. So I can reference that in any potential
> change I submit to open source projects?
> looking at the submitted patch, am I right to assume java.version
> going forward will be the purely a display string value and
> java.specification.version should be used to work out the major
> version number. Should I also assume their will be a
> java.implementation.version if you need to know the low level build
Best to start with JEP 223 . I've no doubt that the Maven maintainers
are aware of the changes, it just might take a while to address issues
in code that parses the version string.
More information about the adoption-discuss