Condy bsm should be idempotent

forax at forax at
Thu Aug 17 17:30:39 UTC 2017

if they are structurally equivalent, same name, same descriptor, same bsm and same bsm arguments,
they should produce the same result.


----- Mail original -----
> De: "Brian Goetz" <brian.goetz at>
> À: "Remi Forax" <forax at>, "amber-spec-experts" <amber-spec-experts at>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Août 2017 19:22:21
> Objet: Re: Condy bsm should be idempotent

> Can you clarify what you mean by "same"?  According to equals(), or ==?
> On 8/17/2017 12:15 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>> There is a way to solve that, mandate the the BSM of a Condy as to be
>> idempotent, i.e. a call to a BSM with the same arguments should provide the
> > same result.

More information about the amber-spec-experts mailing list