Record canonical constructor is required to be public

John Rose john.r.rose at
Sat Nov 9 18:27:31 UTC 2019

On Nov 9, 2019, at 6:59 AM, Tagir Valeev <amaembo at> wrote:
> Probably specifying that
> canonical constructor visibility is the same as record visibility
> would be good.

+1 to that suggestion, although I admit I don’t know the full set
of design considerations.  It’s coherent with some basic rules
that already align constructor and class access.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the amber-spec-experts mailing list