Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359

Brian Goetz brian.goetz at
Fri Oct 4 20:29:35 UTC 2019

The JEP issue has a sub-task, JVMS for records, which is where the spec 
would be attached.  There is currently no draft there, but we'll post 
one soon.

On 10/4/2019 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.
> The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute, is there a reason ?
> Rémi
> [1]

More information about the amber-spec-experts mailing list