Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359

Vicente Romero vicente.romero at
Fri Oct 4 21:33:27 UTC 2019

Hi Remi,

In the meantime you should be able to access the current definition of 
the Record attribute at [1].



On 10/4/19 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.
> The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute, is there a reason ?
> Rémi
> [1]

More information about the amber-spec-experts mailing list