<AWT Dev> jtreg failing in awt tests
philip.race at oracle.com
Wed Nov 23 21:34:46 UTC 2016
So your real complaint isn't the failure itself, but that jtreg bothers
to check directories you aren't even running tests from, and
that is a time tax whether such clashes exist or not ?
Seems a reasonable point ... if I'm running a single Image I/O test
jtreg still finds the java/awt clash and that can't be "free".
Directory "JTwork" not found: creating
Directory "JTreport" not found: creating
Test results: passed: 1
Error: Test clashes with another test with a similar name:
On 11/23/2016 01:19 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Jonathan: Here's a small jtreg feature request:
> It's nice for release engineers to have jtreg check the whole test/
> tree for correct test definitions. But for developers who are just doing
> jtreg MyTest.java
> they're not interested in awt failures, and don't want to pay the
> 10-second tax to check every test definition for every jtreg invocation.
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com <mailto:jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>> wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 12:47 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Am I the only one seeing jtreg test failures in latest
> jdk9/dev, apparently due to
> Error: Test clashes with another test with a similar name:
> (even though I'm not actually running any of the awt tests?)
> It looks like this is a test bug, introduced in this changeset.
> changeset: 16112:88faebbdbf9b
> user: arapte
> date: Fri Nov 04 21:55:19 2016 +0530
> summary: 8160766: [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow
> The problem edit looks like this:
> - test
> - @bug 6386592
> - @summary Tests that disposing a dialog doesn't activate its
> invisible owner.
> - @author anton.tarasov at sun.com <mailto:anton.tarasov at sun.com>:
> - @run applet DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.html
> + @test
> + @key headful
> + @bug 6386592 8160766
> + @summary Tests that disposing a dialog doesn't activate its
> invisible owner.
> Note that plain "test" was edited to "@test", meaning that the
> file previously was not a standalone jtreg test, and it was
> changed to be one. This causes a clash with an HTML test of the
> same base name.
> jtreg correctly reports the clash, because both tests would lead
> to the same .jtr file. i.e. you can't have two tests that only
> differ in their filename extension.
> -- Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the awt-dev