<Beans Dev> JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8151763; Use more informative format for problem list
Joseph D. Darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Tue Mar 29 00:03:49 UTC 2016
New iteration of the webrev updated after the Jigsaw integration and
incorporating the earlier feedback.
On 3/16/2016 4:52 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> Noted; I'll make that improvement in the next round.
> Thanks for pointing this out,
> On 3/16/2016 4:50 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> On 03/11/2016 07:28 PM, joe darcy wrote:
>>> As Jon Gibbons has noted off-list, the problem list entries can
>>> directly include the bug number associated with the test in
>>> question, enabling better reporting. This format should be used
>>> rather than the current convention of putting the bug number in a
>>> Please review the webrev to adopt the revised format for the problem
>>> I've verified jtreg produces the same test list with the old and new
>>> versions of the problem list.
>> You can use a comma-separated list when multiple bugs are involved.
>> The only restriction is, no embedded whitespace within the list
>> 342 # Also 8080165
>> 343 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java 8085982 generic-all
>> can be
>> 343 java/util/Arrays/ParallelPrefix.java 8085982,8080165 generic-all
>> -- Jon
More information about the beans-dev