RFR: JDK-8147795 Build system support for BSD
thomas.stuefe at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 10:06:58 UTC 2016
for what it is worth, I like your effort and think this is valuable.
Looking through your changes, it looks like the current BSD support
(non-apply) is broken in a number of places and I think if we keep it, we
should fix it.
Disclaimer: I am neither a "R"eviewer nor a BSD expert. Because I am a
typical programmer, I looked at your C/C++ changes rather than the makefile
changes :) I understand they are not part of your review, and I was not
sure if you wanted feedback, but nevertheless here are some notes/questions:
About jvmsig_t (also applies to os_bsd.cpp): I do not understand why we do
not use standard POSIX sigset_t to represend signal sets. But I understand
that this is not in the scope of your change.
print_rlimit_info(): would it make not more sense to just print both "AS"
and "DATA" on all platforms?
I am confused about the "waitid on Mac OS X 10.7 seems to be broken;"; if
this is still an issue, would it not make sense to use your alternate path
(using waitpid() instead) for MacOS too?
Should your approach (using sysctl() instead of sysctlbyname) not work on
all BSD variants? Could the __OpenBSD__ and the _ALLBSD_SOURCE_ branch
folded into one?
Kind Regards, Thomas
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2016-01-20 11:54, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> During my spare time last autumn, and in the holidays, I've been playing
>> around with the three major BSDs (FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD), trying to
>> learn something new. (Yeah, I know, this proves that I have no life :-)).
>> And what better way to learn an operating system than to try and build
>> OpenJDK on it? :-) It quickly turned out that while there is a
>> bsd-port/jdk9 forest, it is empty (that is, it's identical to jdk9/jdk9
>> with no BSD-specific patches in it). And building jdk8 is sooo 2014. :)
>> So I started hacking around, focusing on improving issues in the build
>> system that prevented the build to succeed. I also needed to fix issues in
>> the source code (of course), but not as much as I'd expected. My total
>> solution builds and runs (I've tested "javac HelloWorld.java") on the three
>> BSDs, but some workarounds are needed, mostly likely due to incomplete
>> fixes in the source code.
>> The build changes turned out to also be an improvement for all platforms
>> in some areas, and I'd like to integrate it into the mainline. While it is
>> not enough in itself to build on BSD, it's a (necessary) step on the way.
>> I'll post a second review later on for my source code changes, which still
>> need some more cleanup to be presentable.
> However, if anyone is curious, here is my current patchset. Note that this
> is *not* part of the review for JDK-8147795 .
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147795
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bsd-port-dev