Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages
Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM
Mon Feb 11 20:00:53 UTC 2008
I'm thinking that is it makes sense for others to contribute, edit,
or correct the pages, then a wiki makes sense. Just my opinion.
I was thinking that some of my blogs in the past might make sense to
be added to this wiki, but I'm not sure when I'll be able to do that.
Anyone is welcome to post whatever pages they want.
Not that I'm crazy about this particular wiki system. Seems rather
complicated to me, but it's there and it works, sort of.
Adding the glossary was not easy.
Ted Neward wrote:
> Would you (and the others on this list can jump in here with opinions) prefer the Windows build stuff I blogged to go onto the wiki?
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev-
>> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Kelly O'Hair
>> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 3:44 PM
>> To: Jonathan Springer
>> Cc: build-dev
>> Subject: Re: Wiki page for OpenJDK Build pages
>> That's for adding the report.
>> Yes, I did a little re-organization, I'm a little unfamiliar
>> with this particular wiki format and rules.
>> I think anyone can edit and contribute pages to existing
>> spaces, and I can (as BigAloha) add spaces relating to
>> OpenJDK if people think a new one is warranted.
>> Jonathan Springer wrote:
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>> On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair <Kelly.Ohair at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>> I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at:
>>>>> It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them.
>>>> I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug report
>>>> about an x86_64 build issue with b24. I recall from when I first
>>>> tried to build IcedTea that the current build then (b15 I think)
>>>> didn't work on x86_64 either, including the pre-built version from
>>>> Sun. Are builds tested on x86_64 because a lot of obvious problems
>>>> seem to be slipping through the net?
>>> (I added that report.) It may be worth mentioning that that was the
>>> only build problem I ran into; it otherwise seemed to work fine.
>>> BTW, looks like the page has been renamed by Kelly as part of adding
>>> some structure. The new top link is:
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date:
>> 2/10/2008 12:21 PM
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1270 - Release Date: 2/10/2008 12:21 PM
More information about the build-dev