Need reviewers - 6856630: Restructure jaxp repository
Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM
Fri Aug 7 23:11:26 UTC 2009
You've lost these lines: I thought it was a goal to support
DEBUG_CLASSFILES in all repos
72 ifeq ($(DEBUG_CLASSFILES), true)
73 ANT_OPTIONS += -Djavac.debug=true
Is the "drop" name a standard convention, as compared to, say, "import"?
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Need reviewers:
> 6856630: Restructure jaxp/jaxws repositories
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/jdk7/jaxp-6856630/webrev/
> Goal is to ease the jaxp integration into jdk7.
> The JAXP team would make the jdk7 source drop bundles available,
> and integration into jdk7 would involve the modifications of
> some properties in jaxp/build.properties to use the selected bundles.
> * 'ant source' populates the drop source and would be run prior to
> the creation of larger source bundles for openjdk7 and jdk7.
> * Test bundle specifics and how the tests are run are TBD
> * Original jaxp source is still in the "src/" directory and after
> some soak time will be deleted from the repository or moved aside.
> * Formal builds can use ALT_JAXP_SOURCE_BUNDLE to select the bundle.
> * The same basic mechanism would be used for jaxws.
More information about the build-dev