Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927
Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM
Wed Nov 4 18:01:44 UTC 2009
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> It was more of a balancing act on the test groupings with regards to
> etc., and imageio did have "io" in it's name :^), and most of them ran
> in samevm mode. So we can move them to any other group that is run in
> mode. Do you have a better match than jdk_io?
It's probably best to group the image I/O tests with other tests in the
client area. So far I see you've got jdk_awt and jdk_swing. Would the
timing lean themselves to adding a new target or adding to one of the
existing targets? If reducing the test list for jdk_io causes some
unbalance then you could add to it the test list from jdk_nio1 (the
java/nio/file tests) - they are in good shape and run quickly.
More information about the build-dev