Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927
Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM
Wed Nov 4 19:33:11 UTC 2009
Alan Bateman wrote:
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> It was more of a balancing act on the test groupings with regards to
>> etc., and imageio did have "io" in it's name :^), and most of them ran
>> in samevm mode. So we can move them to any other group that is run in
>> mode. Do you have a better match than jdk_io?
> It's probably best to group the image I/O tests with other tests in the
> client area. So far I see you've got jdk_awt and jdk_swing. Would the
> timing lean themselves to adding a new target or adding to one of the
> existing targets? If reducing the test list for jdk_io causes some
> unbalance then you could add to it the test list from jdk_nio1 (the
> java/nio/file tests) - they are in good shape and run quickly.
I'll move them to jdk_misc for now. Only 22 tests total anyway.
More information about the build-dev