Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927
martinrb at google.com
Thu Nov 5 01:31:44 UTC 2009
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 16:49, Jonathan Gibbons <Jonathan.Gibbons at sun.com> wrote:
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> In an ideal world, one set of results would be the set of results posted
> publicly somewhere for the latest promoted build. But we don't seem to be
I agree with the goals, and your assessment of the reality.
> able to make that happen, so I agree with Kelly that for now we need a more
> pragmatic approach of defining the set of tests we expect to work on every
> platform on every build. Hopefully, over time, the relevant engineers will
> aspire to have their tests included in this set of tests.
I would use the ProblemList if there was an easy way to use it to filter
my jtreg command
The most recent jtreg command I ran looked like this:
jtreg -v:nopass,fail -vmoption:-enablesystemassertions -automatic
"-k:\!ignore" test/java/nio test/sun/nio test/java/util/EnumSet
test/java/util/List test/java/util/Map test/java/util/concurrent
Most of my failures were due to inability to contact javaweb.sfbay
which is probably not being addressed by ProblemList.
(BTW I am not seriously objecting to this change,
just throwing in my own personal experience)
More information about the build-dev