Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Wed May 16 00:39:41 UTC 2012
... but it would be able to go, eventually, "make test" :-)
On 05/15/2012 05:38 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I agree.
> Builds are builds, and tests are tests. We need some separation here.
> On May 15, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> I think it would be good to see a more general proposal for how
>> to handle tests in this new world, and then to see this Queens test
>> be a part of that design.
>> -- Jon
>> On 05/15/2012 04:34 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> I should probably have posted this here as well...
>>> There is a newer webrev than the one below at:
>>> This adds:
>>> * Skip building test_gamma if TEST_IN_BUILD is not enabled
>>> * If cross-compiling, set TEST_IN_BUILD to false instead of making
>>> an early exit in test_gamma.
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build")
>>> an option that can be disabled
>>> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:05:10 +0200
>>> From: Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>
>>> To: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> As part of the new build system created in the build-infra project, we
>>> want to make it a configurable option wether or not to run the Queens
>>> test as part of the build.
>>> Here is a patch that introduces a new make variable, TEST_IN_BUILD,
>>> which controls wether to run the Queens test (test_gamma.sh) or not. If
>>> the variable is not explicitely set, it will default to true, mening
>>> that the default behaviour will be as before, that is, to run the Queens
>>> test. However, if you (or configure) explicitely set it to false, the
>>> Queens test will be skipped.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the build-dev