New build system problems
martinrb at google.com
Tue Mar 5 23:44:33 UTC 2013
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>wrote:
> On 6/03/2013 9:17 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> IMO the right approach is to improve processes so that bad commits don't
>> cause other developers to lose time. Once upon a time, I was actually
>> the tl gatekeeper and I implemented such a system. Today, I see there's
>> a tl-gate, but there's close to zero testing between submission to
>> tl-gate and "promotion" to tl-proper. In the system I implemented,
>> there was a full build/test cycle in between.
> The processes should be there to catch mistakes, not to encourage lack of
> upfront testing.
I disagree. The submitter should be responsible for the "right" amount of
> If the "gate" provided such functionality it would be like submitting each
> change via JPRT. While a nice idea it is completely impractical given the
> resources it would require.
But ... I actually implemented such a system for tl, back in 2005!
The current state is a regression.
More information about the build-dev