RFR [9] Modular Source Code

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Fri Aug 15 17:52:32 UTC 2014

Yes, we (the LangTools team) are on our own for this file.   Jan Lahoda 
did some work to update the build.xml file for us.  At some point we may 
want to do more surgery on this file, but that is a discussion for the 
LangTools team to have.

-- Jon

On 08/15/2014 06:17 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> On 2014-08-15 14:54, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>> I'm looking at the langtools-related changes in build.xml; I what is 
>> the degree of support available in the build.xml ant file for the 
>> Jigsaw world? It seems to me that not all the target would function 
>> and it also seems that some of the properties previously encoded in a 
>> side property file (make/build.properties) have now been inlined in 
>> the build.xml file itself, which seems problematic maintenance-wise. 
>> Am I missing something?
> As far as I know, build.xml has so far been supported by the langtools 
> team themselves and all changes to the file in this patch have been 
> made by them. Jon may have something to say?
> /Erik
>> Maurizio
>> On 12/08/14 15:10, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> This is a review request for the Initial changes for JEP 201: 
>>> Modular Source Code [1].
>>> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. 
>>> Some, possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the To section of 
>>> this mail, and they will help address any comments arising from this 
>>> review request.
>>> For the purposes of review, the actual source file moves have been 
>>> omitted from the webrev below, with the exception of any source file 
>>> that has a change to it’s actual content. The new location of the 
>>> source files can be determined from JEP 201 [1] and JEP 200 "The 
>>> Modular JDK" [2], or by browsing the staging forest [3].
>>> Webrevs:
>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8054834/00/
>>> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion 
>>> has been tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments 
>>> are welcome, although given the nature of the changes then we might 
>>> have to create separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later 
>>> in jdk9/dev..
>>> -Chris.
>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051619
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051618
>>> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/stage

More information about the build-dev mailing list