[patch] fix compiler flag for linux sparc targets
david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Sep 5 23:07:59 UTC 2016
On 5/09/2016 9:33 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Patch looks ok.
> To my knowledge, nobody is actively keeping linux-sparc working in 9, so
> I would expect it to be broken.
It is not a listed platform for 9 or 8 (not even listed as known to be
These patches likely fall out of scope now that we have hit RDP1.
> On 2016-09-05 13:10, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> at least in 9b134 the build system currently picks up the wrong
>> compiler flag on
>> linux sparc targets. The patch below only applies it for solaris builds.
>> --- a/common/autoconf/flags.m4
>> +++ b/common/autoconf/flags.m4
>> @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@
>> # Set some additional per-CPU defines.
>> if test "x$OPENJDK_$1_OS-$OPENJDK_$1_CPU" = xwindows-x86; then
>> $2JVM_CFLAGS="[$]$2JVM_CFLAGS -arch:IA32"
>> - elif test "x$OPENJDK_$1_CPU" = xsparcv9; then
>> + elif test "xx$OPENJDK_$1_OS-$OPENJDK_$1_CPU" = xsolaris-sparcv9; then
>> $2JVM_CFLAGS="[$]$2JVM_CFLAGS -xarch=sparc"
>> elif test "x$OPENJDK_$1_CPU" = xppc64; then
>> if test "x$OPENJDK_$1_OS" = xlinux; then
>> Is the linux sparc port supposed to work in 9? It apparently does in
>> jdk8, but
>> the build later fails with
>> function 'bool checkByteBuffer(address, address, u_char**)':
>> error: 'thread' was not declared in this scope
>> *stub = SharedRuntime::handle_unsafe_access(thread, npc);
>> lib/CompileJvm.gmk:201: recipe for target
More information about the build-dev