RFR (L, tedious again, sorry) 8189610: Reconcile jvm.h and all jvm_md.h between java.base and hotspot
david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Oct 27 12:31:33 UTC 2017
LTO is irrelevant now.
On 27/10/2017 9:44 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2017-10-26 22:44, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>> Hi Magnus,
>> Thank you for reviewing this. I have a new version that takes out
>> the hack in globalDefinitions.hpp and adds casts to
>> src/hotspot/share/opto/type.cpp instead.
>> Also some fixes from Martin at SAP.
>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8189610.02/webrev
>> see below.
>> On 10/26/17 5:57 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> Thank you for addressing this!
>>> On 2017-10-25 18:49, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> Summary: removed hotspot version of jvm*h and jni*h files
>>>> Mostly used sed to remove prims/jvm.h and move #include "jvm.h"
>>>> after precompiled.h, so if you have repetitive stress wrist issues
>>>> don't click on most of these files.
>>>> There were more issues to resolve, however. The JDK windows
>>>> jni_md.h file defined jint as long and the hotspot windows jni_x86.h
>>>> as int. I had to choose the jdk version since it's the public
>>>> version, so there are changes to the hotspot files for this.
>>>> Generally I changed the code to use 'int' rather than 'jint' where
>>>> the surrounding API didn't insist on consistently using java types.
>>>> We should mostly be using C++ types within hotspot except in
>>>> interfaces to native/JNI code. There are a couple of hacks in places
>>>> where adding multiple jint casts was too painful.
>>>> Tested with JPRT and tier2-4 (in progress).
>>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8189610.01/webrev
>>> Looks great!
>>> Just a few comments:
>>> * src/java.base/unix/native/include/jni_md.h:
>>> I don't think the externally_visible attribute should be there for
>>> arm. I know this was the case for the corresponding hotspot file for
>>> arm, but that was techically incorrect. The proper dependency here is
>>> that externally_visible should be in all JNIEXPORT if and only if
>>> we're building with JVM feature "link-time-opt". Traditionally, that
>>> feature been enabled when building arm32 builds, and only then, so
>>> there's been a (coincidentally) connection here. Nowadays, Oracle
>>> does not care about the arm32 builds, and I'm not sure if anyone else
>>> is building them with link-time-opt enabled.
>>> It does seem wrong to me to export this behavior in the public
>>> jni_md.h file, though. I think the correct way to solve this, if we
>>> should continue supporting link-time-opt is to make sure this
>>> attribute is set for exported hotspot functions. If it's still
>>> needed, that is. A quick googling seems to indicate that
>>> visibility("default") might be enough in modern gcc's.
>>> A third option is to remove the support for link-time-opt entirely,
>>> if it's not really used.
>> I didn't know how to change this since we are still building ARM with
>> the jdk10/hs repository, and ARM needed this change. I could wait
>> until we bring down the jdk10/master changes that remove the ARM build
>> and remove this conditional before I push. Or we could file an RFE to
>> remove link-time-opt (?) and remove it then?
> I'm looking into the link-time-opt issue right now. I think it boils
> down to us using an incorrect flag to gcc when linking, -fwhole-program,
> when -fuse-linker-plugin should have been used. This caused all exported
> symbols to disappear unless they were attributed with
> externally_visible, which makes sense for a program but not a shared
> library. I'm currently trying to verify that -fuse-linker-plugin removes
> the need for the externally_visible attribute when using link-time-opt.
> If it does, I'll open a separate bug to fix that, and if I push that
> first, you can safely delete the externally_visible attributes.
>>> * src/java.base/unix/native/include/jvm_md.h and
>>> These files define a public API, and contain non-trivial changes. I
>>> suspect you should file a CSR request. (Even though I realize you're
>>> only matching the header file with the reality.)
>> I filed the CSR. Waiting for the next steps.
>>>> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189610
>>>> I have a script to update copyright files on commit.
>>>> Thanks to Magnus and ErikJ for the makefile changes.
More information about the build-dev