RFR(S) 8197453 : Add support of extra problem list
igor.ignatyev at oracle.com
Mon Feb 26 23:07:54 UTC 2018
yes, they are. we will generic-all to each line.
do you think it makes sense to file an RFE for jtreg to report a missed platform specifier as an error?
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:
> If these new problem-list files are destined for use by jtreg, I would encourage adding a platform specifier on each line, after the bug number. If you want to mark the test as excluded on all platforms, the convention is to use "generic-all".
> -- Jon
> On 2/26/18 11:47 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> adding build-dev alias
>> -- Igor
>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 3:08 PM, Ekaterina Pavlova <ekaterina.pavlova at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> ProblemList.txt files used by makefiles for jtreg testing allow to specify list of tests to be excluded
>>> from execution on all or specific platforms. However to test such features like Graal we want to be able
>>> to specify list of failed tests which fail in particular JVM mode only.
>>> Please review this change which adds support of extra problem list and introduces 2 Graal specific problem list files.
>>> - test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-graal.txt
>>> - test/jdk/ProblemList-graal.txt
>>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197453
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~epavlova//8197453/webrev.00/
>>> testing: precheckin, tier1 and tier2 with empty EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS.
>>> testing in Graal mode with EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=ProblemList-graal.txt
>>> Igor Ignatyev volunteered to sponsor this change.
More information about the build-dev