RFR: 8194493 test for release file checking needs to be tier1
Randy.Crihfield at Oracle.com
Fri Jan 5 13:09:09 UTC 2018
This isn't a core lib test, or a vm test, or an install test, or any
When someone builds the OpenJDK, they need to know right off if they
actually built the OpenJDK w/o including the closed bits.
If this test fails, then there's no point in running any other test. It
is actually a build test.
Now, if you believe the test group entry should be located in a special
build test place that I didn't see, that's fine.
If there is no build test location, then perhaps there SHOULD be if this
is not sufficient.
Because of its nature to determine if the build is even worth testing, I
made it a tier1.
On 01/ 3/18 07:58 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> The build team don't have anything to do with TEST.groups, this should
> be reviewed on core-libs-dev.
> On 4/01/2018 2:26 AM, Randy Crihfield wrote:
>> I need to add the negative test created for JDK-8192837 to the
>> TEST.groups file.
>> The related bug is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194493
>> The diff is very short and included below.
>> Any comments/suggestions are welcome, also I will need a sponsor for
>> it at the end…
>> randyc at pollux -> hg diff TEST.groups
>> diff -r 3a52333a5e57 test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> --- a/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> +++ b/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
>> java/nio/Buffer \
>> com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher \
>> :jdk_math \
>> - tools/pack200
>> + tools/pack200 \
>> + :build_sanity
>> tier2 = \
>> :jdk_io \
>> @@ -60,6 +61,10 @@
>> # Other test definitions; generally smaller granularity than tiers
>> +# Build source checking
>> +build_sanity = \
>> + sanity/releaseFile
>> # java.lang package and VM runtime support
>> jdk_lang = \
>> java/lang \
>> randyc at pollux ->
More information about the build-dev