RFR (round 1), JDK-8214259: Implementation: JEP 189: Shenandoah: A Low-Pause Garbage Collector
rkennke at redhat.com
Wed Nov 28 12:41:24 UTC 2018
>> On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:46 AM, Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kim,
>>>> Sections to review (at this point) are the following:
>>>> *) shared-gc
>>>> - This is mostly boilerplate that is common to any GC
>>>> - referenceProcessor.cpp has a little change to make one assert not fail (next to CMS and G1)
>>> Ick. But I don’t have a better suggestion that doesn’t involve adding a new API
>>> to CollectedHeap for use by this assertion, which seems a bit excessive if there
>>> are no other uses.
>> I guess we could add a config _discovery_is_concurrent or similar in RP,
>> and check that. Or maybe one of _discovery_is_mt or _discovery_is_atomic
>> already covers that? I couldn't immediately tell/100% understand their
>> semantics. Seems worthy to look at after this?
> It might be equivalent to _discovery_is_atomic; I don’t remember the exact
> semantics right now. I think it’s unrelated to _discovery_is_mt.
> Yes, looking at this later is fine. Please file an RFE.
>>>> - taskqueue.hpp has some small adjustments to enable subclassing
>>> Why this change instead of JDK-8204947? As the description from that RFE says:
>>> "The ShenandoahTaskTerminator from the Shenandoah project is a much better implementation of a task terminator.”
>> Yeah, see Zhengyu's comment. Let's ignore those changes for this review
>> (for now), expect our impl ported to taskqueue.hpp/cpp soon.
> I’m okay with that plan. Maybe add a comment in JDK-8204947 about this?
Thanks for reviewing,
More information about the build-dev