RFR (S): 8221880: Better customization for Windows RC properties FileDescription and ProductName
christoph.langer at sap.com
Thu Apr 4 14:15:49 UTC 2019
> >> In OpenJDK builds, the current strings evaluate to "OpenJDK Platform"
> >> and for Oracle builds "Java(TM) Platform SE". It makes me curious as to
> >> what you need to modify the string to?
> > We want to print "SapMachine" there, see this commit:
> > I would also be beneficial, if we could add a configure option for
> MACOSX_BUNDLE_NAME_BASE and MACOSX_BUNDLE_ID_BASE. We have
> a diff there as well:
> This makes me wonder why you don't also want to change the
> to SapMachine. Wouldn't it make more sense to have it all match? Or are
> you worried about compatibility issues if users expect the value
> OpenJDK? At least Oracle and OpenJDK builds have different values there
Yes, we are worried about compatibility issues. It starts with (jtreg) tests that would fail. To that we could make adaptions, of course. But looking around all other downstream vendors stick with OpenJDK so far. So, no reason why we should go this route first
> > Or are there maybe other hooks to customize these kinds of properties?
> No other hooks that I know of. If you need customization, please add
> configure parameters. We haven't added any only because nobody has
> needed such customization yet.
Ok, I'll see if I come up with configuration parameters for the Mac properties. But I'll do it in a different change.
> > In any case, if it comes to a push of this change, I'd then let you do it to
> coordinate with your internal infrastructure
> OK, I can do that if needed, but if we find a solution where it's not,
> I'm happy to let you push yourself. :)
Good. Then we are back at my latest webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8221880.1/
Anything you want me to change? Otherwise, please do your preparations and let me know when and how this is going to be committed
More information about the build-dev