PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals

Roel Spilker r.spilker at
Thu Mar 12 09:29:52 PDT 2009

Oh yes, you're right.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jesse Wilson <jesse at> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Roel Spilker <r.spilker at> wrote:
>> Secondly, the proposal only allows Field and Method literals that are
>> visible to the caller. But my experience is that I use reflection often to
>> access private members of other classes. So more false positives in the
>> search results.
> No, non-visible members aren't included in these search results.
> Class.getMethod() returns only public methods.

More information about the coin-dev mailing list