Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
jjb at google.com
Thu Mar 19 12:32:19 PDT 2009
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:
> Rather, I'm talking about the implicit Iterator variable that is
> created by the expansion of the for-each loop. Unlike Iterable,
> Iterators are one-shot, so making one a resource is natural. But,
> with the current ARM proposal, there is no way to use the for-each
> loop with an Iterable whose Iterator is an AutoResource. Experience
> with C#'s foreach loop and IDisposable/IEnumerable has shown the
> combination to be very useful, as it avoids some very awkward
> situations when both resources and loops are used together in a
> These kinds of issues make me think that more actual experience with
> the proposed construct will be required before we can have confidence
> that it is "right".
I disagree. Java long ago rejected the use of iterators that required
explicit termination. This is simply a non-issue in the Java ecosystem.
I'm not saying that it was an entirely good decision, but it is the
decision we made.
More information about the coin-dev