Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
markmahieu at googlemail.com
Sat Mar 21 09:37:32 PDT 2009
2009/3/21 Joshua Bloch <jjb at google.com>
> What if you have an interface that extends an interface that extends the
> magic marker? There should be nothing wrong with that. While there may be
> some easy way to specify this (and give it reasonable semantics) it isn't
> jumping out at me. If anyone has any clever ideas along these lines, I'd
> love to know.
I'm probably missing the point, but doesn't the JLS generally use the phrase
'is a subtype of' to describe this kind of relationship?
More information about the coin-dev