For further consideration...
Joseph D. Darcy
Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Mon Mar 30 08:20:03 PDT 2009
David Goodenough wrote:
> On Monday 30 March 2009, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>> David Goodenough wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 25 March 2009, David Goodenough wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Joe Darcy wrote:
>>> It is a shame that no-one has seen fit to reply to this note.
>> Especially since there has been no other recent traffic on the list to
>> read or respond to!
> I realise that there have been a lot of new proposals to consider, but
> I am trying to understand what it is that needs to be improved in my
> proposal in order to get it considered. Without feedback that is very
> difficult. That is why I asked the questions about, and was dissapointed
> not to get a reply.
When the subject of your proposal is listed as being out of scope before
the project starts,
you should not be surprised when your proposal doesn't move forward.
More information about the coin-dev