For further consideration...

Bob Lee crazybob at
Mon Mar 30 11:39:17 PDT 2009


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, David Goodenough <
david.goodenough at> wrote:

> This is NOT the same as saying it is listed as out of scope, and the reason
> given is that it is likely to be "at least medium sized".  My proposal is
> (at least to my eyes) smaller than many that are being accepted, and
> so would therefore seem to fall INSIDE the scope, NOT outside it.

While your proposal may be small on syntax and library changes (I actually
don't think it's small myself), based on the feedback you received,
properties in general are obviously big on controversy.


More information about the coin-dev mailing list