Review request for JDK-8013357: Javac accepts erroneous binary comparison operations
eric.mccorkle at oracle.com
Thu Jun 13 13:02:19 PDT 2013
Thanks Alex. Your suggested comment changes will be applied.
Given that this patch changes the behavior of the type checker, though,
I would like to get approval from Jon or Maurizio (if not both) before
it goes in.
On 06/13/13 15:41, Alex Buckley wrote:
> With regard to TestComparisons.java in
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8013357/webrev.06/ :
> - In the second set of truth tables (for boxed primitive types), I like
> how the 3 moves across the second row :-)
> - The comment "// Reference types" should be something like "//
> Important reference types", because the "// Boxed primitives" comment
> also deals with reference types.
> - Line 167 says Int but means Integer.
> - Line 271/272 should be "String, comparable to any reference type,
> excluding those convertible to a numeric types, but including any
> Other than that, good to go.
> On 6/13/2013 12:28 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>> I've moved the new test into types as Jon suggested, and reordered the
>> lists/truth tables as Alex suggested. A new webrev is up here:
>> On 06/11/13 12:31, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2013 06:10 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>>> Good suggestion.
>>>> Something else occurred to me: the scope of this test has grown beyond
>>>> that of a simple regression test. It should probably be moved to a
>>>> subdirectory of test/tools/javac purposed for more exhaustive tests.
>>>> Jon or Maurizio, do you have an suggestions?
>>> Yes, test/tools/javac/types seems a better home.
>>> We are trying to deprecate/minimize the use of bug numbers within
>>> the test/tools/javac directory itself.
>>> -- Jon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20130613/4de868cf/eric_mccorkle.vcf
More information about the compiler-dev