RFR: 8274405: Suppress warnings on non-serializable non-transient instance fields in javac and javadoc
prappo at openjdk.java.net
Wed Sep 29 18:14:35 UTC 2021
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:49:28 GMT, Joe Darcy <darcy at openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Is there any semantic difference between "not statically Serilizable" and "not a Serilizable type"? Also, there's a typo: Seri-a-lizable.
> Same semantics. The first phase of this cleanup used "not statically Serilizable"; however, I thought "not a Serilizable type" is a more precise statement. I can make a pass over the PR and make the wording consistent in the new comments.
You could update this PR if only to fix the typo; the phrasing is up to you.
More information about the compiler-dev