hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6642323: Speeding up Single Byte Decoders; ...
Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM
Thu Jan 8 18:03:22 UTC 2009
> Tag jdk7-b41 was added 2008/12/08 in this list, and jdk7-b42 _2 weeks
> ago_, so according your rule above, changeset b89ba9a6d9a6, which was
> published 2008/12/10, should be in b41, at least in b42, but it isn't.
> That was the reason for my question.
There are two orderings that may be confusing the situation. There is
the ordering of the changesets, and the dates a particular changeset was
created. The dates listed by mercurial are the dates that the change
set was created. Recall that changesets are first introduced in a
subgate, and then has to go through testing before it hits the MASTER
gate, which is where the releases are built from. If you look at the
log now, there are several client changesets done 5 months ago that just
hit the MASTER gate yesterday, but haven't yet appeared in a JDK build.
Eventually, there will be a tag for b43 created when that build is
done and everything following it in changeset order should be contained
in that build.
5 months ago igor 4356282: RFE: T2K should be used to rasterize CID/CFF
fonts changeset | manifest
5 months ago bae 6687968: PNGImageReader leaks native memory through an
Inflater. changeset | manifest
2 weeks ago tbell Merge changeset | manifest
4 weeks ago sherman 6642323: Speeding up Single Byte Decoders changeset
The "tbell merge" was the last integration to the gate before Lana's
Client integration yesterday.
If you look at the current build schedule:
you'll see that b43 should be done next Thursday, and the tag added
Hope that's clearer, and more importantly, that I didn't say anything
>> Regarding 6642323, looks like it's now in the MASTER, but there hasn't
>> been a promotion yet. I'd guess it'll be b43.
> I guess too, according Sherman's answer,
> Thanks for your time,
More information about the core-libs-dev