Review request for 4917309 and 6864003

Mandy Chung Mandy.Chung at Sun.COM
Fri Jul 24 16:12:02 UTC 2009

Thanks everyone.  I like clean code as well.  Since it's a new entry 
point and launcher hasn't used it yet, it is the best chance to clean 
this up.   I will eliminate the throwError parameter and do the 
synchronized integration.

Caveat: I have to double check if FX launcher is using this entry 
point.  I don't think per my conversation with Kumar.  But better to 

The HS fix will go in b68 and the JDK fix will go in b70.


Alan Bateman wrote:
> Paul Hohensee wrote:
>> Can't remove it unless it's fixed in jdk6 as well as 7.  Also, one of 
>> these days we'll
>> get around to shipping current hotspot in jdk5 and maybe 1.4.2.  How 
>> would these
>> be affected?
>> paul
> I don't think it is used as it's not in the jdk's jvm.h yet. I checked 
> jdk6 this morning in case it was being used there but it doesn't 
> appear to be. I think the simplest way to get this parameter removed 
> is to do the hotspot changes now and wait until it's in a promoted 
> build before pushing the jdk changes. Doing it later, as Keith 
> suggested, would require a polka lasting several builds.
> -Alan.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list