[PATCH 1/1] Get rid of synchronization in java.util.logging.LogRecord constructor

David M. Lloyd david.lloyd at redhat.com
Thu Mar 12 23:10:16 UTC 2009

On 03/12/2009 05:41 PM, Mark Reinhold wrote:
> You might want to have a look at the new contribution process [1].
> Using that will increase the probability that someone will evaluate
> your patch sooner rather than later.
> - Mark
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute

Consider my post to be step 2 of that process.  The patch itself is 
probably the most succinct way of expressing the proposed change (it only 
took a minute or two to write in any case).

Anyone have comments on the change?


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list