JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
Christian.Thalinger at Sun.COM
Sun Oct 4 09:39:14 UTC 2009
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 23:43 -0500, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I've always found it a bit perplexing that java.lang was never chosen
> for the parent package of the Dynamic API. Why is that? Dynamic types
> are now "part of the language" as proven by spec itself and exotic
> identifiers. Will this be reconsidered?
[I'm forwarding this question to mlvm-dev.]
I think John Rose or another member of the EG should have an answer to
More information about the core-libs-dev