Why does util.timer does not expose interrupt
i30817 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 14 09:54:26 UTC 2009
Never mind, just realized that there is no guarantee of what Task
would see it at the correct time. Its easier to set a flag to false
before the sleep and check it after it.
Not thinking concurrently enough.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Paulo Levi <i30817 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would be really helpful for those tasks that are "paused" purposefully or not.
More information about the core-libs-dev