Review for CR 6728865 : Improved heuristics for Collections.disjoint() [updated]
David.Holmes at oracle.com
Mon Dec 20 00:42:05 UTC 2010
Mike Duigou said the following on 12/20/10 10:29:
> I have updated the webrev for CR 6728865 with Rémi's feedback. The new webrev is at:
> The size() comparisons are now done only when both c1 and c2 are not sets and I have removed the isEmpty() micro-optimization.
So to summarise this change:
1. The original code checked for c1 being a set and not c2, but not
vice-versa - this fixes that
2. This code adds an optimization when they are both not sets but at
least one is empty
Did I miss anything?
Seems functionally sound to me, but I can't attest to any performance
More information about the core-libs-dev