martinrb at google.com
Mon May 24 19:04:58 UTC 2010
Does this mean that the jar index feature may get some much needed
love in the future?
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:38, Xueming Shen <xueming.shen at oracle.com> wrote:
> Another cleanup. The jar manual  clearly indicates the options "cuxti"
> are exclusive with each
> other. The check code was missed when the "i" was added in.
> Please help review.
> #Issue of "-i0" mentioned in the description (tracked in a separate
> CR#4823701) is no longer reproducible.
More information about the core-libs-dev