Code review request for 6543593 "(reflect) Clarify private final field mutability"

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at
Mon Apr 4 12:34:03 UTC 2011

Joe Darcy wrote:
> Fair enough.  How about just for the setter methods
> +     * @exception IllegalAccessException    if this {@code Field} object
> +     *              enforces Java language access control and the 
> underlying
> +     *              field is inaccessible or is final.
I think a comma before the "and" would make this a bit clearer (as the 
two conjunctions might force the reader to read it more than once to get 
the meaning).


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list