Review (Updated) : 4884238 : Constants for Standard Charsets

Ulf Zibis Ulf.Zibis at
Tue Apr 19 11:57:20 UTC 2011

Am 19.04.2011 10:14, schrieb Alan Bateman:
> Given that it now only defines the constants for the standard charsets then I think the new name 
> is better, although with static import then it might not matter too much.
> I'm not sure whether we should use this in the zip code as we don't want this to causes the lesser 
> used charsets to be loaded. It might be worth double checking the startup.

So the use cases for those charset constants minimize against zero.

As written before, I more prefer canonical name constants.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list