advice & review requested for 6896297, race condition in rmid causing JCK failure

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at
Wed Apr 20 16:00:32 UTC 2011

Stuart Marks wrote:
> Hi all,
> Please review an updated webrev for this bug:
> Using ConcurrentHashMap is much nicer in many ways, and it seems to 
> resolve the JCK failures at least as well as the previous fix did. 
> This does nothing to remedy the issue of snapshot consistency, which 
> seems to be covered by 4945726, which we'll postpone (again) to a 
> future release.
This is nicer and apologies for raising the concern about serialization 
compatibility - I incorrectly thought that these tables were declared as 

At L242 you might want to include a comment to remind a future 
maintainer why it's a zero length array rather than using size().


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list