RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Dec 5 02:52:07 UTC 2011

Thanks Chris and Doug et al. These fixups look good to me too.

One minor nit:


The javadoc changes on longValue() changed actual text not just 
formatting. It changes it to be consistent with other methods, but is a 
change none-the-less. Not saying we can't do it, just pointing it out.


On 3/12/2011 3:18 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> On 12/ 2/11 04:22 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
>> ....
>> We just went through these and others, and believe that everything
>> is now warning free.
> Thanks Doug, Wow you guys are quick!
> I pulled in these specific changes (atomic) and updated the webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7117360/webrev.01/webrev/
> I'm slowly working through the j.u.c.* classes and hope to have a webrev
> out next week.
> -Chris.
>> -Doug

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list