java.util patch for Warning Cleanup Day
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Fri Dec 9 00:01:48 UTC 2011
On 12/06/2011 10:29 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> I have reviewed this patch and also run it against the java/util jtreg test. It looks good to me.
> Some comments:
> - The current mercurial source has one of your changes but the remaining two changes, diamond and @SW are still valid.
> - This file also has changes in the current mercurial source. Your version, IMO, is an improvement over the mercurial version and should be applied.
> -The changes to use wildcard instead of the type parameters are a bit disappointing but reasonable.
There is no good solution. At least this one is coherent for the whole
file (and LinkedHashMap)
and avoid warnings in equals, remove etc.
> - The change to readObject() (using a single constructor) is theoretically outside of the scope of "warnings only" but I am OK with it.
I forget to mention that change. I found it was weird to have a
nullcheck to call a constructor that accepts null.
More information about the core-libs-dev