Code review request for 7049774
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Fri Jun 10 13:56:43 UTC 2011
Chris Hegarty wrote:
> But as I said, I don't have a specific problem with Sean's webrev if
> others are in agreement with it.
This originally came up in the context of an older release of the
proprietary JDK so there has been a bit of prior discussion. We asked
Sean to bring it here as it applicable to the java.rmi.server.UID that
is in OpenJDK too. Maybe for 8 or beyond then someone could reexamine
UID and come up with a way to change the specification that doesn't
cause compatibility issues.
More information about the core-libs-dev